This manual page primarily describes AREs. BREs mostly exist for backward compatibility in some old programs; they will be discussed at the end. POSIX EREs are almost an exact subset of AREs. Features of AREs that are not present in EREs will be indicated.
An ARE is one or more branches, separated by `|', matching anything that matches any of the branches.
A branch is zero or more constraints or quantified atoms, concatenated. It matches a match for the first, followed by a match for the second, etc; an empty branch matches the empty string.
A quantified atom is an atom possibly followed by a single quantifier. Without a quantifier, it matches a match for the atom. The quantifiers, and what a so-quantified atom matches, are:
The forms using { and } are known as bounds. The numbers m and n are unsigned decimal integers with permissible values from 0 to 255 inclusive.
An atom is one of:
A constraint matches an empty string when specific conditions are met. A constraint may not be followed by a quantifier. The simple constraints are as follows; some more constraints are described later, under ESCAPES.
The lookahead constraints may not contain back references (see later), and all parentheses within them are considered non-capturing.
An RE may not end with `\'.
If two characters in the list are separated by `-', this is shorthand for the full range of characters between those two (inclusive) in the collating sequence, e.g. [0-9] in ASCII matches any decimal digit. Two ranges may not share an endpoint, so e.g. a-c-e is illegal. Ranges are very collating-sequence-dependent, and portable programs should avoid relying on them.
To include a literal ] or - in the list, the simplest method is to enclose it in [. and .] to make it a collating element (see below). Alternatively, make it the first character (following a possible `^'), or (AREs only) precede it with `\'. Alternatively, for `-', make it the last character, or the second endpoint of a range. To use a literal - as the first endpoint of a range, make it a collating element or (AREs only) precede it with `\'. With the exception of these, some combinations using [ (see next paragraphs), and escapes, all other special characters lose their special significance within a bracket expression.
Within a bracket expression, a collating element (a character, a multi-character sequence that collates as if it were a single character, or a collating-sequence name for either) enclosed in [. and .] stands for the sequence of characters of that collating element. The sequence is a single element of the bracket expression's list. A bracket expression in a locale that has multi-character collating elements can thus match more than one character. So (insidiously), a bracket expression that starts with ^ can match multi-character collating elements even if none of them appear in the bracket expression! (Note: Tcl currently has no multi-character collating elements. This information is only for illustration.)
For example, assume the collating sequence includes a ch multi-character collating element. Then the RE [[.ch.]]*c (zero or more ch's followed by c) matches the first five characters of `chchcc'. Also, the RE [^c]b matches all of `chb' (because [^c] matches the multi-character ch).
Within a bracket expression, a collating element enclosed in [= and =] is an equivalence class, standing for the sequences of characters of all collating elements equivalent to that one, including itself. (If there are no other equivalent collating elements, the treatment is as if the enclosing delimiters were `[.' and `.]'.) For example, if o and ô are the members of an equivalence class, then `[[=o=]]', `[[=ô=]]', and `[oô]' are all synonymous. An equivalence class may not be an endpoint of a range. (Note: Tcl currently implements only the Unicode locale. It doesn't define any equivalence classes. The examples above are just illustrations.)
Within a bracket expression, the name of a character class enclosed in [: and :] stands for the list of all characters (not all collating elements!) belonging to that class. Standard character classes are:
A locale may provide others. (Note that the current Tcl implementation has only one locale: the Unicode locale.) A character class may not be used as an endpoint of a range.
There are two special cases of bracket expressions: the bracket expressions [[:<:]] and [[:>:]] are constraints, matching empty strings at the beginning and end of a word respectively. A word is defined as a sequence of word characters that is neither preceded nor followed by word characters. A word character is an alnum character or an underscore (_). These special bracket expressions are deprecated; users of AREs should use constraint escapes instead (see below).
Character-entry escapes (AREs only) exist to make it easier to specify non-printing and otherwise inconvenient characters in REs:
Hexadecimal digits are `0'-`9', `a'-`f', and `A'-`F'. Octal digits are `0'-`7'.
The character-entry escapes are always taken as ordinary characters. For example, \135 is ] in ASCII, but \135 does not terminate a bracket expression. Beware, however, that some applications (e.g., C compilers) interpret such sequences themselves before the regular-expression package gets to see them, which may require doubling (quadrupling, etc.) the `\'.
Class-shorthand escapes (AREs only) provide shorthands for certain commonly-used character classes:
Within bracket expressions, `\d', `\s', and `\w' lose their outer brackets, and `\D', `\S', and `\W' are illegal. (So, for example, [a-c\d] is equivalent to [a-c[:digit:]]. Also, [a-c\D], which is equivalent to [a-c^[:digit:]], is illegal.)
A constraint escape (AREs only) is a constraint, matching the empty string if specific conditions are met, written as an escape:
A word is defined as in the specification of [[:<:]] and [[:>:]] above. Constraint escapes are illegal within bracket expressions.
A back reference (AREs only) matches the same string matched by the parenthesized subexpression specified by the number, so that (e.g.) ([bc])\1 matches bb or cc but not `bc'. The subexpression must entirely precede the back reference in the RE. Subexpressions are numbered in the order of their leading parentheses. Non-capturing parentheses do not define subexpressions.
There is an inherent historical ambiguity between octal character-entry escapes and back references, which is resolved by heuristics, as hinted at above. A leading zero always indicates an octal escape. A single non-zero digit, not followed by another digit, is always taken as a back reference. A multi-digit sequence not starting with a zero is taken as a back reference if it comes after a suitable subexpression (i.e. the number is in the legal range for a back reference), and otherwise is taken as octal.
Normally the flavor of RE being used is specified by application-dependent means. However, this can be overridden by a director. If an RE of any flavor begins with `***:', the rest of the RE is an ARE. If an RE of any flavor begins with `***=', the rest of the RE is taken to be a literal string, with all characters considered ordinary characters.
An ARE may begin with embedded options: a sequence (?xyz) (where xyz is one or more alphabetic characters) specifies options affecting the rest of the RE. These supplement, and can override, any options specified by the application. The available option letters are:
Embedded options take effect at the ) terminating the sequence. They are available only at the start of an ARE, and may not be used later within it.
In addition to the usual (tight) RE syntax, in which all characters are significant, there is an expanded syntax, available in all flavors of RE with the -expanded switch, or in AREs with the embedded x option. In the expanded syntax, white-space characters are ignored and all characters between a # and the following newline (or the end of the RE) are ignored, permitting paragraphing and commenting a complex RE. There are three exceptions to that basic rule:
a white-space character or `#' preceded by `\' is retained
white space or `#' within a bracket expression is retained
white space and comments are illegal within multi-character symbols like the ARE `(?:' or the BRE `\('
Expanded-syntax white-space characters are blank, tab, newline, and any character that belongs to the space character class.
Finally, in an ARE, outside bracket expressions, the sequence `(?#ttt)' (where ttt is any text not containing a `)') is a comment, completely ignored. Again, this is not allowed between the characters of multi-character symbols like `(?:'. Such comments are more a historical artifact than a useful facility, and their use is deprecated; use the expanded syntax instead.
None of these metasyntax extensions is available if the application (or an initial ***= director) has specified that the user's input be treated as a literal string rather than as an RE.
Most atoms, and all constraints, have no preference. A parenthesized RE has the same preference (possibly none) as the RE. A quantified atom with quantifier {m} or {m}? has the same preference (possibly none) as the atom itself. A quantified atom with other normal quantifiers (including {m,n} with m equal to n) prefers longest match. A quantified atom with other non-greedy quantifiers (including {m,n}? with m equal to n) prefers shortest match. A branch has the same preference as the first quantified atom in it which has a preference. An RE consisting of two or more branches connected by the | operator prefers longest match.
Subject to the constraints imposed by the rules for matching the whole RE, subexpressions also match the longest or shortest possible substrings, based on their preferences, with subexpressions starting earlier in the RE taking priority over ones starting later. Note that outer subexpressions thus take priority over their component subexpressions.
Note that the quantifiers {1,1} and {1,1}? can be used to force longest and shortest preference, respectively, on a subexpression or a whole RE.
Match lengths are measured in characters, not collating elements. An empty string is considered longer than no match at all. For example, bb* matches the three middle characters of `abbbc', (week|wee)(night|knights) matches all ten characters of `weeknights', when (.*).* is matched against abc the parenthesized subexpression matches all three characters, and when (a*)* is matched against bc both the whole RE and the parenthesized subexpression match an empty string.
If case-independent matching is specified, the effect is much as if all case distinctions had vanished from the alphabet. When an alphabetic that exists in multiple cases appears as an ordinary character outside a bracket expression, it is effectively transformed into a bracket expression containing both cases, so that x becomes `[xX]'. When it appears inside a bracket expression, all case counterparts of it are added to the bracket expression, so that [x] becomes [xX] and [^x] becomes `[^xX]'.
If newline-sensitive matching is specified, . and bracket expressions using ^ will never match the newline character (so that matches will never cross newlines unless the RE explicitly arranges it) and ^ and $ will match the empty string after and before a newline respectively, in addition to matching at beginning and end of string respectively. ARE \A and \Z continue to match beginning or end of string only.
If partial newline-sensitive matching is specified, this affects . and bracket expressions as with newline-sensitive matching, but not ^ and `$'.
If inverse partial newline-sensitive matching is specified, this affects ^ and $ as with newline-sensitive matching, but not . and bracket expressions. This isn't very useful but is provided for symmetry.
The only feature of AREs that is actually incompatible with POSIX EREs is that \ does not lose its special significance inside bracket expressions. All other ARE features use syntax which is illegal or has undefined or unspecified effects in POSIX EREs; the *** syntax of directors likewise is outside the POSIX syntax for both BREs and EREs.
Many of the ARE extensions are borrowed from Perl, but some have been changed to clean them up, and a few Perl extensions are not present. Incompatibilities of note include `\b', `\B', the lack of special treatment for a trailing newline, the addition of complemented bracket expressions to the things affected by newline-sensitive matching, the restrictions on parentheses and back references in lookahead constraints, and the longest/shortest-match (rather than first-match) matching semantics.
The matching rules for REs containing both normal and non-greedy quantifiers have changed since early beta-test versions of this package. (The new rules are much simpler and cleaner, but don't work as hard at guessing the user's real intentions.)
Henry Spencer's original 1986 regexp package, still in widespread use (e.g., in pre-8.1 releases of Tcl), implemented an early version of today's EREs. There are four incompatibilities between regexp's near-EREs (`RREs' for short) and AREs. In roughly increasing order of significance:
{ followed by a digit in an ARE is the beginning of a bound, while in RREs, { was always an ordinary character. Such sequences should be rare, and will often result in an error because following characters will not look like a valid bound.
In AREs, \ remains a special character within `[ ]', so a literal \ within [ ] must be written `\\'. \\ also gives a literal \ within [ ] in RREs, but only truly paranoid programmers routinely doubled the backslash.
AREs report the longest/shortest match for the RE, rather than the first found in a specified search order. This may affect some RREs which were written in the expectation that the first match would be reported. (The careful crafting of RREs to optimize the search order for fast matching is obsolete (AREs examine all possible matches in parallel, and their performance is largely insensitive to their complexity) but cases where the search order was exploited to deliberately find a match which was not the longest/shortest will need rewriting.)
Copyright © 1998 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Copyright © 1999 Scriptics Corporation Copyright © 1995-1997 Roger E. Critchlow Jr.